Impact of considering occipital nerve blockade in differential diagnosis of headache on cost and workday loss
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 306-314
September 2016

Impact of considering occipital nerve blockade in differential diagnosis of headache on cost and workday loss

Gulhane Med J 2016;58(3):306-314
1. Neurological Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
2. Ear Nose and Throat Service, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Kasimpasa Building, Istanbul, Turkey.
3. Department of Neurosurgery, Sultan Abdülhamit Training and Research Hospital,İstanbul,Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 22.05.2015
Accepted Date: 28.06.2015
Publish Date: 30.08.2016
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

An unreasonable amount of tests and excessive hospital visits and workday loss is a matter of dispute in failed headache cases. Current study was designed (retrospective case control study) to estimate the burden of headache on society and investigate the efficacy of great occipital nerve block in providing a costeffective working diagnosis. 64 patients among 136 outpatients presenting with headache were enrolled in the study. For 30 of 64 patients (group A), it was the first time that they were being evaluated for headache. However, 34 of 64 patients (group B) were previously evaluated at various clinics with numerous tests. All patients answered a questionnaire, and subsequently occipital nerve blockade was performed. Visual analog scale was used to measure the efficacy of the procedure. Mean workday loss was 33.4 ± 21.3 days (min 10, max 90 days) in Group B and 5.6 ± 1.8 days (min 1, max 10 days) in Group A. Patients in the group A had the diagnosis of ON or CHA with the use of least number of tests and cost. GON blocks both as diagnostic and therapeutic intervention provided a cost-effective working diagnosis of CHA and ON.