E-ISSN: 2146-8052
The comparison of the efficacy of different sedation protocols in colonoscopy
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
VOLUME: 58 ISSUE: 2
P: 143-147
June 2016

The comparison of the efficacy of different sedation protocols in colonoscopy

Gulhane Med J 2016;58(2):143-147
DOI: 10.5455/gulhane.512
Necla Dereli 1
Münire Babayiğit 1
Eyüp Horasanlı 1
Zehra Baykal Tutal 1
Handan Güleç 1
Mehmet Şirin Gökhaner 1
Aslı Alkan 1
Mustafa Alparslan Babayiğit 2
1. Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Kliniği, Keçiören Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Ankara, Türkiye.
2. Halk Sağlığı Anabilim Dalı, Gülhane Askeri Tıp Akademisi, Ankara, Türkiye.
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 21.10.2014
Accepted Date: 15.01.2015
Publish Date: 10.06.2016
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Colonoscopy is a procedure for differential diagnosis and treatment of colon diseases. It is painful and uncomfortable. Sedation is very important for colonoscopy to be successfully completed. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of propofol-fentanyl, propofol-ketamine and propofol- remifentanyl combinations. This prospective randomized study was performed on ASA I-II, 93 patients who underwent colonoscopy procedure. Patients received to propofol-ketamine (n:29) (Group PK), propofol-fentanyl (n: 33) (Group PF) or propofol-remifentanil (n=31) (Group PR). All patients received study drugs till ramsey sedation scale of patients titrated to 3-4. Hemodynamic data, peripheral oxygen saturation, recovey and sedation times, endoscopist and patient satisfaction, side effects of the agents were recorded. Demographic data, hemodynamic data, sedation and recovery times and patient satisfactory were found similar in the three groups( p > 0,05 for all comparisons ). Endoscopist satisfaction was % 100 in Group PK( p: 0.027). Therefore, propofol-ketamine combination for the colonoscopy might be preferable.