The comparative results of three different real-time PCR assays: MY09/11 primers failed to detect multiple infections
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 65-70
June 2014

The comparative results of three different real-time PCR assays: MY09/11 primers failed to detect multiple infections

Gulhane Med J 2014;56(2):65-70
1. GATF Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı.
2. GATF Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı.
3. GATF Tıbbi Patoloji Anabilim Dalı.
4. GATF Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 26.07.2013
Accepted Date: 26.08.2013
Publish Date: 20.06.2014
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

HPV-DNA testing is widely used worldwide today and it has become an important part of cervical cancer screening programs. The aim of this study is re-evaluating the effectiveness of MY09/11 consensus primer system, which is one of the most widely used HPVDNA tests, by using a different approach. In this study, MY09/11 consensus PCR and two different TaqMan-based type-specific PCR assays were used for investigation of the presence of 17 different HPV types in cervical smear samples. Of the 470 samples, 33.2% (156/470) were HPV-DNA positive by at least one of the three methods and remains were negative by all methods. A total of 220 different HPV isolates were identified in 149 samples by the type specific PCR, while the nine samples were positive by consensus PCR only. A single HPV type was detected in 64.4% (96/149) of the genotyped samples, and multiple HPV types were detected in the remaining 35.6% (53/149). MY09/11 PCR failed to detect 21.2% (33/156) of all HPV-DNA positive samples and the rates of false negative results were 18.75% (18/96) and 28.3% (15/53) in single and multiple infections, respectively. We conclude that highly sensitive type-specific PCR tests may be a useful tool for screening of cervical cancer.

Keywords: HPV, real-time PCR, MY09/11, multiple infection

References

2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House