Malpractice Cases Related With Emergency Medicine, Evaluated By Supreme Council of Health Between 2000-2004
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Research
P: 226-231
September 2004

Malpractice Cases Related With Emergency Medicine, Evaluated By Supreme Council of Health Between 2000-2004

Gulhane Med J 2004;46(3):226-231
1. GATA Acil Tıp Ana Bilim Dalı
2. GATA Adli Tıp Ana Bilim Dalı
No information available.
No information available
Accepted Date: 30.06.2004
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Since urgent cases are important among the health problems, and have legal characteristics as well, phsyicians have more responsibility for urgent patients than nonurgent ones. In case of malpractice, Supreme Council of Health, Council of Forensic Medicine and Public Prosecutor assign experts to decide whether there is fault or not. In this paper; judgment reports, related to medical responsibility of physicians in departments of emergency medicine in Supreme Council of Health, in 2000-2004 were evaluated. It was seen that they decided on no fault for 57 cases but they considered that it had been malpractice for the 55.

Considering physician medical and legal responsibility, physicians in emergency departments should examine patients carefully; perform required laboratory tests and consultations quickly. In addition, severely ill patients should be monitored until patients' vital signs are stabilized; and if required, they should be transported to an advanced medical center immediately.

Keywords: Medicolegal Responsibility, Emergency Medicine, Malpractice, Forensic Medicine

References

2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House